Genealogy by Martha

Cross - Love - Culpepper - Herron - Mordecai - Shelby - Cobb

Charles II of Britain Of Britain

Charles II of Britain Of Britain

Male 1630 - 1685  (54 years)


Personal Information    |    Notes    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Charles II of Britain Of Britain 
    Nickname Stuart 
    Birth 29 May 1630  St. James Parrish, London, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Gender Male 
    Death 6 Feb 1685  London, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Person ID I6009  MyTree
    Last Modified 15 Aug 2009 

    Father Charles I (the Martyr) Of Britain,   b. 19 Nov 1600, Fife, Scotland Find all individuals with events at this locationd. 1649, London, England Find all individuals with events at this location (Age 48 years) 
    Mother Henrietta Maria Of France   d. 1669 
    Marriage 1625 
    Family ID F3435  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    Family Catherine de Braganza Of Portugal 
    Family ID F3438  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
    Last Modified 17 Jul 2017 

  • Notes 
    • Succeeded his father in 1649, but was not restored to the throne until
      1660 after the period of Commonwealth.

      King of Great Britain and Ireland (1660–85), who was restored to the
      throne after years of exile during the Puritan Commonwealth. The years
      of his reign are known in English history as the Restoration period.
      His political adaptability and his knowledge of men enabled him to
      steer his country through the convolutions of the struggle between
      Anglicans, Catholics, and dissenters that marked much of his reign.

      Charles II, the eldest surviving son of Charles I and Henrietta Maria
      of France, was born at St. James's Palace, London. His early years
      were unremarkable, but before he was 20 his conventional education had
      been completely overshadowed by the harsh lessons of defeat in the
      Civil War against the Puritans and subsequent isolation and poverty.
      Thus Charles emerged into precocious maturity, cynical,
      self-indulgent, skilled in the sort of moral evasions that make life
      comfortable even in adversity.

      But though the early years of tawdry dissipation have tarnished the
      romance of his adventures, not all his actions were discreditable. He
      tried to fight his father's battles in the west of England in 1645; he
      resisted the attempts of his mother and his sister Henrietta Anne to
      convert him to Catholicism and remained openly loyal to his Protestant
      faith. In 1648 he made strenuous efforts to save his father; and when,
      after Charles I's execution in 1649, he was proclaimed Charles II by
      the Scots in defiance of the English republic, he was prepared to go
      to Scotland and swallow the stringently anti-Catholic and
      anti-Anglican Presbyterian Covenant as the price for alliance. But the
      sacrifice of friends and principles was futile and left him deeply
      embittered. The Scottish army was routed by the English under Oliver
      Cromwell at Dunbar in September 1650, and in 1651 Charles's invasion
      of England ended in defeat at Worcester. The young king became a
      fugitive, hunted through England for 40 days but protected by a
      handful of his loyal subjects until he escaped to France in October
      1651.

      His safety was comfortless, however. He was destitute and friendless,
      unable to bring pressure against an increasingly powerful England.
      France and the Dutch United Provinces were closed to him by Cromwell's
      diplomacy and he turned to Spain, with whom he concluded a treaty in
      April 1656. He persuaded his brother James to relinquish his command
      in the French army and gave him some regiments of Anglo-Irish troops
      in Spanish service, but poverty doomed this nucleus of a royalist army
      to impotence. European princes took little interest in Charles and his
      cause, and his proffers of marriage were declined. Even Cromwell's
      death did little to improve his prospects. But George Monck, one of
      Cromwell's leading generals, realized that under Cromwell's successors
      the country was in danger of being torn apart and with his formidable
      army created the situation favourable to Charles's restoration in
      1660.

      Most Englishmen now favoured a return to a stable and legitimate
      monarchy, and, although more was known of Charles II's vices than his
      virtues, he had, under the steadying influence of Edward Hyde, his
      chief adviser, avoided any damaging compromise of his religion or
      constitutional principles. With Hyde's help, Charles issued in April
      1660 his Declaration of Breda, expressing his personal desire for a
      general amnesty, liberty of conscience, an equitable settlement of
      land disputes, and full payment of arrears to the army. The actual
      terms were to be left to a free parliament, and on this provisional
      basis Charles was proclaimed king in May 1660. Landing at Dover on May
      25, he reached a rejoicing London on his 30th birthday.

      The unconditional nature of the settlement that took shape between
      1660 and 1662 owed little to Charles's intervention and must have
      exceeded his expectations. He was bound by the concessions made by his
      father in 1640 and 1641, but the Parliament elected in 1661 was
      determined on an uncompromising Anglican and royalist settlement. The
      Militia Act of 1661 gave Charles unprecedented authority to maintain a
      standing army, and the Corporation Act of 1661 allowed him to purge
      the boroughs of dissident officials. Other legislation placed strict
      limits on the press and on public assembly, and the 1662 Act of
      Uniformity created controls of education. An exclusive body of
      Anglican clergy and a well-armed landed gentry were the principal
      beneficiaries of Charles II's restoration.

      But within this narrow structure of upper-class loyalism there were
      irksome limitations on Charles's independence. His efforts to extend
      religious toleration to his Nonconformist and Roman Catholic subjects
      were sharply rebuffed in 1663, and throughout his reign the House of
      Commons was to thwart the more generous impulses of his religious
      policy. A more pervasive and damaging limitation was on his financial
      independence. Although the Parliament voted the king an estimated
      annual income of £1,200,000, Charles had to wait many years before his
      revenues produced such a sum, and by then the damage of debt and
      discredit was irreparable. Charles was incapable of thrift; he found
      it painful to refuse petitioners. With the expensive disasters of the
      Anglo-Dutch War of 1665–67 the reputation of the restored king sank to
      its lowest level. His vigorous attempts to save London during the
      Great Fire of September 1666 could not make up for the negligence and
      maladministration that led to England's naval defeat in June 1667.

      Charles cleared himself by dismissing his old adviser, Edward Hyde,
      Earl of Clarendon, and tried to assert himself through a more
      adventurous foreign policy. So far, his reign had made only modest
      contributions to England's commercial advancement. The Navigation Acts
      of 1660 and 1663, which had been prompted by the threat to British
      shipping of the rise of the Dutch carrying trade, were valuable
      extensions of Cromwellian policies, and the capture of New York in
      1664 was one of his few gains from the Dutch. But although marriage to
      Princess Catherine of Braganza of Portugal in 1662 brought him the
      possession of Tangier and Bombay, they were of less strategic value
      than Dunkirk, which he sold to Louis XIV in 1662. Charles was,
      however, prepared to sacrifice much for the alliance of his young
      cousin. Through his sister Henrietta Anne, Duchess of Orléans, he had
      direct contact with the French court, and it was through her that he
      negotiated the startling reversal of the Protestant Triple Alliance
      (England, the Dutch United Provinces, Sweden) of 1668. By the terms of
      the so-called Secret Treaty of Dover of May 1670, not only did England
      and France join in an offensive alliance against the Dutch but Charles
      promised to announce his conversion to Roman Catholicism. If this
      provoked trouble from his subjects he was assured of French military
      and financial support. Charles saw to it that the conversion clause of
      the treaty was not made public.

      This clause, which was the most controversial act of Charles II's
      reign, can be explained as a shortsighted bid for Louis XIV's
      confidence. In this, however, it failed. Louis neither welcomed
      Charles's intentions nor believed in them and, in the event, it was
      only upon his deathbed that Charles was received into the Roman
      Catholic church. But Charles had now fatally compromised himself.
      Although he subsequently attempted to pursue policies independent of
      Louis, he remained bound to him by inclination as well as by the fear
      of blackmail. More seriously, he had lost the confidence of his
      subjects, who deplored the French alliance and distrusted the whole
      tendency of Charles's policies.

      Other circumstances deepened Englishmen's discontent with their king.
      By the 1670s, the miscarriages of the queen had reduced hopes that
      Charles would have a legitimate heir, and in 1673 the second marriage
      of his brother James, Duke of York, to Mary of Modena, increased the
      possibility of the Catholic line of succession, for James's conversion
      to the Roman church was well known. But it was for his autocratic
      character as much as for his religion that James was feared as his
      brother was not, and it was on his brother's behalf that Charles
      eventually had to face the severest political storm of his reign.

      The Popish Plot of 1678 was an elaborate tissue of fictions built
      around a skeleton of even stranger truths. The allegations of Titus
      Oates, a former Anglican cleric who had been expelled from a Jesuit
      seminary, that Roman Catholics planned to murder Charles to make James
      king, seemed to be confirmed by scraps of evidence of which Charles
      was justifiably skeptical. But Charles was obliged to bow before the
      gusts of national hysteria that sought to bar his brother from the
      line of succession. Between 1679 and 1681 Charles very nearly lost
      control of his government. Deprived of his chief minister, the Earl of
      Danby, who had been compromised by his negotiations with France, the
      king had to allow the Earl of Shaftesbury and his Whig supporters, who
      upheld the power of the Parliament—men whom he detested—to occupy
      positions of power in central and local government. Three general
      elections produced three equally unmanageable parliaments; and
      although Charles publicly denied the legitimacy of his first son, the
      Protestant Duke of Monmouth, he had to send his Catholic brother James
      out of the country and offer a plan of limitations that would bind
      James if he came to the throne. The plan proved to be unacceptable
      both to the Whigs and to James, and, when Charles fell seriously ill
      in the summer of 1679, there was real danger of civil conflict.

      But Charles kept his nerve. He defended his queen against slanders,
      dismissed the intractable parliaments, and recovered control of his
      government. His subjects' dread of republican anarchy proved stronger
      than their suspicion of James, and from March 1681, when he dissolved
      his last Parliament, Charles enjoyed a nationwide surge of loyalty
      almost as fervent as that of 1660. He had made yet another secret
      treaty with France and in addition to a French subsidy could now count
      upon a healthy public revenue. Reforms at the Treasury, which he had
      inaugurated in 1667, provided the crown with a firm basis of
      administrative control that was among Charles II's most valuable
      legacies to English government.

      As a result of these actions, Charles, who died in February 1685 at
      Whitehall in London, was able to end his reign in the kind of tranquil
      prosperity he had always sought.
      (Source: Encylopedia Britannica 2002)